 |
Brilliant like brand new very low shutter count, exceptional Item so pleased I bought it
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: Pre-owned
I bought this as a replacement for my Nikon D3300, which I lost on holiday. This is in better condition than my original camera, with a lower shutter count and a very reasonable price. Very happy with my purchase.
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: Pre-owned
Excellent product and straightforward purchase. Thank you.
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: Pre-owned
I'd have to say that the 3000 range of Nikon camera's are probably at the pinnacle of image quality for a consumer DSLR. I usually use it at lower resolutions than the full 24mp's which saves space on the sd card. Unless I need to crop the image and if I'm using a tripod, then I'll use the full 24MP's.The D3100 and the D3000 are both excellent camera's too. I haven't seen any discernible difference between the D3000, the D3100, the D3200 and the D3300 to be totally honest so if anyone is looking for one of these and can't quite afford it, then don't be afraid to get a D3000 or 3100 instead. If you want shoot movies to use then get a video camera instead as the movies are just usable enough for an emergency really. There is no real need to take RAW images with these camera's as the in camera processing is absolutely superb. and unless you really enjoy the process of photo editing after the event then you may as well just use it in jpeg mode. The live view on the camera is great I think. I like to switch to live mode to compose the photo then switch back to the viewfinder and take the shot but that's my favorite way. The only camera's that take noticeably better images at this sensor size (APS) that I have seen is the Sony NEX's. Shouldn't really be saying anything about those in this review but every serious camera/gadget/photo freak (like me) should have one. The only downer to the 3000 range is probably the size of the camera's. Great for someone with small hands but I have had to get the extra vertical grip to accommodate my medium size hands. By the way,I bought my D3200,refurbished for around £160 which is ridiculous for what it is.Read full review
Manufacturers, Nikon included, always want you to buy the latest product loaded with stuff you didn't think you needed. Magazines aren't much better, waxing lyrical about wi-fi connectivity and video capability. Meanwhile the D3200 continues to sell, with little or no current advertising. That should tell you that there are lots of photographers out there, just like me, who know the D3200 is all they need. Don't take any notice of those snooty reviews that hint that the build quality is inferior. It is as good as any non-magnesium body. If you're the kind of person whole drools over the latest Apple gizmo, this is not for you. However, if all that matters to you is image quality then buy it...unless you can afford an FX. Have a look on line at what Ken Rockwell has to say about it if you don't believe me. Oh, I only gave 4/5 for features because there's too many for me. I'd have given the latest D3300 3/5!Read full review
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Best-selling in Digital Cameras
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Save on Digital Cameras
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- You may also like
